Re: Regarding Implicit AND's
Richard Fikes <pwtc!fikes@labrea.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 90 13:27 PDT
From: Richard Fikes <pwtc!fikes@labrea.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Regarding Implicit AND's
To: interlingua@vaxa.isi.edu
Cc: pwtc!Fikes@labrea.stanford.edu
Included-Msgs: <9007182012.AA18893@tc.pw.com>,
The message of 18 Jul 90 12:48 PDT from labrea!allegra!rjb@research.att.com
Message-id: <19900718202731.1.FIKES@peso.tc.pw.com>
From: labrea!allegra!rjb@research.att.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 90 12:48 PDT
Original-From: allegra!rjb (Ron Brachman)
To: research!labrea.stanford.edu!uucp!pwtc!fikes@[131.209.1.10]
Subject: Re: Regarding Implicit AND's
I agree with you wholeheartedly. Get rid of implicit connectives -
they're dangerous.