Re: CCAT: EMOTIONS

phayes@cs.uiuc.edu (Pat Hayes)
Message-id: <199411231849.AA22180@dante.cs.uiuc.edu>
X-Sender: phayes@dante.cs.uiuc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 12:51:12 -0600
To: fritz@rodin.wustl.edu (Fritz Lehmann), srkb@cs.umbc.edu
From: phayes@cs.uiuc.edu (Pat Hayes)
Subject: Re: CCAT: EMOTIONS
Cc: wisdom@mcs.com
Sender: owner-srkb@cs.umbc.edu
Precedence: bulk
>...... ontologies
>built by Roger Schank's followers in the late 1970's and
>early 1980's. 

Really?? I thought the whole concept of "ontology" in this new sense was
only about 5 years old. Do you mean to refer to any organised collection of
ideas..or what?

Pat

PS. In general, did a coherent view of 'ontology' emerge from the recent
meeting? Danny Bobrow has sent me notes on one view of the meaning of the
term, but Id be interested in any others if there are any.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Beckman Institute                                 (217)244 1616 office
405 North Mathews Avenue        	(217)328 3947 or (415)855 9043 home
Urbana, IL. 61801                                 (217)244 8371 fax  	  

Phayes@cs.uiuc.edu 
----------------------------------------------------------------------