RE: DOS version of ontolinguaJames Rice <rice@HPP.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 1995 10:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Rice <rice@HPP.Stanford.EDU>
Subject: RE: DOS version of ontolingua
To: "James M. Peters" <jpeters+@CMU.EDU>
cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
In-reply-to: James M. Peters's message of Fri, 2 Jun 1995 07:09:46 -0400 (EDT): <Ejnj5um00iVG00sUY0@andrew.cmu.edu>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
James M. Peters <jpeters+@CMU.EDU> writes:
>>Is there a version of ontolingua designed to run in a DOS or Windows
>>version of common lisp?
There are two answers to this question:
a) No. There is no version of Ontolingua that has ever (knowingly)
been ported to a Lisp running under DOS. Having said this, there's
nothing particularly complicated about Ontolingua 4.*, and the FTPable
version would probably work (almost) out of the box if your Lisp
is comes from one of the vendors for which the code was already
known to work on other platforms.
Having said this, the version of Ontolingua that you can FTP from
Stanford (4.*) is the old version and is really not "supported" in
any serious way. We really have to get around to cleaning up
our web pages to reflect this change. I would tend to try to
discourage you from trying to run this form of Ontolingua.
You're welcome to do so, it's just that you're (largely) on your own.
b) Yes, it's just that you don't actually run Ontolingua on your PC,
you run it over the net on one of our machines from Netscape/Mosaic.
This is, for us, the prefered mode of Ontolingua use. It's the only
way that _we_ use ontolingua, and it's the only one we support. We
aren't shipping this code at all, and because of not spending our
time on the thankless task of making things portable, we have been
able to make the new Ontolingua 5.0 substantially more powerful and
useable than any previous version.
The bottom line is that I'd council using Ontolingua by going to
Hope this helps,